Broad COBRA Changes in 2009 Stimulus Bill

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “Act”) was signed by President Obama on February 17, 2009. This Act includes several significant changes to COBRA that employers will quickly need to address. 

The most immediate and notable impact will be a significant reduction in the COBRA premiums paid by certain employees whose employment is involuntarily terminated (and their spouses and dependents who are COBRA-entitled). These individuals can get a 65 percent government-paid subsidy toward their COBRA premiums. Employers are required to “front” the subsidy by paying the full premium and obtaining a reimbursement via a later payroll tax offset. The subsidy takes effect for COBRA coverage periods beginning after the February 17, 2009 enactment date (March 1, 2009 for most plans). 

Who Gets the Subsidy?
The subsidy is available to employees terminated involuntarily on or after September 1, 2008 and before January 1, 2010, as well as to their spouses and dependents who are COBRA-entitled.

The Act does not define “involuntary termination.” The phrase clearly includes employees terminated by a company for any reason, other than the standard COBRA exception for “gross misconduct.” It would also appear to apply to employees who are asked by a company to sign a separation agreement as an alternative to being fired, even if it is characterized as a “voluntary resignation.” Until there is further official guidance, employers should consult legal counsel if they have a question about whether a specific termination of employment is “involuntary.”

 

If persons terminated involuntarily before the February 17, 2009 enactment date or their spouses or dependents who are COBRA-entitled are already on COBRA, the subsidy will apply to coverage periods beginning after the enactment date. If these persons did not elect COBRA, or if the COBRA coverage they did elect is no longer in effect (for example, if COBRA coverage was terminated for failure to pay the premium), they will have an opportunity now to elect coverage with the subsidy for coverage periods beginning after the enactment date. If they do so, their period of COBRA entitlement will be measured from their original COBRA-qualifying event date, but their period of coverage and the subsidized premium will begin with the first coverage period after the enactment date. Any break in coverage between the original COBRA-qualifying event date and the commencement of coverage after the enactment date will be disregarded for purposes of calculating breaks in coverage relevant to pre-existing condition limitations.

 

How Long Does the Subsidy Last?

The subsidized premiums can continue for up to a maximum of nine (9) months, beginning with the first coverage period that occurs after the enactment date. The subsidized premium will end before the expiration of this nine-month period upon the earlier to occur of either of the following: the person is no longer eligible for COBRA; or the person becomes eligible for (versus enrolled in) group medical insurance or Medicare. (These subsidy rules are different than the rules for terminating COBRA before the end of the maximum coverage period. COBRA coverage terminates not when a qualified beneficiary becomes eligible for other group health plan coverage or for Medicare but when the qualified beneficiary actually enrolls in the coverage.) Persons who receive the subsidy are required to notify the group health plan if they subsequently become eligible for other group medical insurance coverage or for Medicare. Failure to provide notification may result in a penalty of 110 percent of the premium subsidy for the period after the person became eligible for the other coverage.

 

How Do the Notice and Election Rules Work?

For involuntary terminations that occur after the February 17, 2009 enactment date, the terminated employees and their COBRA-entitled spouses and dependents must be given notice of the premium subsidy (referred to in the Act as “additional notification.”) The Department of Labor (“DOL”) is required to issue model notices on or before March 19, 2009. Because that date falls well within the 44-day COBRA notice period applicable to terminations after the enactment date (assuming the employer is also the plan administrator), employers can delay giving COBRA notices until the models are available, if they choose. However, doing so will mean that the 60-day period for electing COBRA will not begin until those notices are given. If an employer prefers to give a COBRA notice before the model notices are available, and thereby begin the 60-day election period, the employer will have to draft a notice regarding the premium subsidy consistent with the requirements of the Act for “additional notification.”

 

For persons terminated involuntarily after September 1, 2008 and before the enactment date, employers must provide notices about the premium subsidy on or before April 18, 2009. DOL model notices for this purpose are to be available by March 19, 2009. Those who are already on COBRA as of the enactment date must be given notice that the subsidy will take effect with the first coverage period after the enactment date. Those who are not on COBRA as of the enactment date must be given information about the subsidy and notice of their opportunity to elect coverage with the subsidy beginning with the first coverage period after the enactment date. They will have sixty (60) days after the notice within which to elect coverage with the premium subsidy.

 

Finally, notice of the available premium subsidy must be provided to all other individuals who are or were COBRA-qualified beneficiaries based upon any qualifying event that occurred on or after September 1, 2008, even though these individuals would not be entitled to receive the subsidy unless they became eligible due to an involuntary termination.

 

What About People Who Pay the Full Premium During the First Two Months of the Subsidy Period?
Persons who pay the full COBRA premium for either of the first two periods of coverage to which the premium subsidy applies will be entitled to reimbursement of the premium subsidy or to a credit against future premium payments (if it is reasonable to believe the credit will be used within 180 days of the overpayment).

How Does the Company Get Reimbursement for Premium Subsidies?

Employers can offset the COBRA premium subsidies against their federal payroll tax obligations by claiming a credit on IRS Form 941 – Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return. If the Company’s payroll tax obligation is less than the amount of COBRA premium subsidies, the resulting “overpayment” of payroll taxes can be applied to the next return or be requested as a refund. Employers are required to maintain supporting documentation, including attestations of involuntary terminations of employment for each affected employee, a report of the amount of payroll taxes offset during the current reporting period and an estimate of amounts to be offset during the next reporting period, and a report for each covered employee and qualified beneficiary containing taxpayer identification numbers, amounts of subsidy reimbursed, and an identification of whether coverage is of one or more than one individual. 

 

Can a Person Change From One Plan to Another?

At its option, an employer may offer persons eligible for the premium subsidy the choice to enroll in a different, lower cost medical plan offered by the employer. Because of the administrative burdens and complexities involved with allowing enrollment changes, some employers may choose not to permit them.

 

Do All Persons Who Are Involuntarily Terminated Qualify For the Subsidy?

Subject to the early termination provisions discussed above, all employees terminated involuntarily on or after September 1, 2008 and before January 1, 2010, as well as their spouses and dependents who are COBRA-entitled, qualify for the subsidy. However, only those persons who earn less than $125,000 annually ($250,000 for joint returns) receive the subsidy tax-free. Eligible persons earning more than those amounts are subject to recapture of all or a portion of the subsidy with their tax return, depending on their actual income. The Act provides that persons who earn in excess of those amounts may choose to permanently waive the subsidy by notifying the employer of the waiver.

 

What If The Employer is Paying the COBRA Premium Under a Severance Arrangement?

In some cases, employers offer severance agreements to terminated employees under which the employer pays the COBRA premium for a period of time. The Act does not directly speak to this somewhat common circumstance. The logical presumption is that the subsidy will not begin until the first month in which the former employee has to pay a portion of the COBRA premium. It is unclear in that circumstance whether the former employee will be entitled to the subsidy for nine (9) additional months from that point. Although it would seem reasonable to conclude that the subsidy is available for up to nine (9) months beginning with the first month for which the premium subsidy is actually paid, Treasury officials have reportedly stated in informal, nonbinding remarks that the nine (9) month period is to be measured from the first coverage period for which the subsidy would have been payable, had the employer not been paying the COBRA premium.

 

Do Persons Denied the Subsidy Have Special Appeal Rights?

Persons who are not provided the subsidy may appeal the denial directly to the Secretary of Labor (or to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in certain cases) in a manner to be determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury. A decision on the appeal will be rendered within 15 days after receipt of the application for review.

 

What Should You Do Now?

  • Identify those employees involuntarily terminated on or after September 1, 2008, together with their spouses and dependents who were or are COBRA-entitled. Of this group, identify as a subset (the “Special Election Group”), the people who are entitled to a special COBRA election period because COBRA was either never elected or COBRA coverage ended before February 17, 2009. Determine the last available contact information for all people involuntarily terminated on or after September 1, 2008, all of whom are entitled to notice of the availability of the premium subsidy. As soon as the DOL has provided model notices, and before April 18, 2009, send notice to this group, informing them of the availability of the premium subsidy. Also before this April 18, 2009 deadline, provide people in the Special Election Group notice of the opportunity to elect COBRA during the special sixty (60) day COBRA election period
  • Identify those individuals who are or were COBRA-entitled based upon any qualifying event that occurred on or after September 1, 2008 other than involuntary termination. These individuals must be provided notice of the premium subsidy.
  • Determine whether you will permit election of coverage in a different, lower cost medical plan.
  • For all persons terminated from employment on or after February 17, 2009, provide a modified election notice or separate notice regarding the availability of the COBRA premium subsidy, either based upon the language in the Act or upon the model notice that is to be issued by the DOL.
  • Modify, as necessary, plan documents, summary plan descriptions and COBRA notices. Distribute revised summary plan descriptions or summaries of material modifications and revised COBRA notices, as appropriate.
  • Contact your COBRA Administrator, if you have one. They may assist you in taking these steps.

Stimulus Bill Contains Whistleblower Protections for Employees of State & Local Governments and Private Employers who Receive Stimulus Funds

The “economic stimulus bill”—formally referred to as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009—signed into law on February 17, 2009 includes a whistleblower protection provision for employees of private contractors and state and local governments who report gross mismanagement, gross waste, public safety issues, abuse of authority, or violation of law in the implementation or use of the stimulus funds.  See American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5, § 1553.  These whistleblower protections are often referred to as the “McCaskill Amendment.”

Like other whistleblower protection statutes, the stimulus bill’s whistleblower protections require that an employee satisfy certain requirements in order to be protected.  First, the wrongdoing reported must be one of the following: (1) gross mismanagement of the agency contract or stimulus funds; (2) gross waste of stimulus funds; (3) abuse of authority in implementing or using the stimulus funds; (4) a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to an agency contract or grant using stimulus funds; or (5) a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety in the implementation or use of stimulus funds.  Second, the employee must have a “reasonable belief” that the information he/she possesses is evidence of wrongdoing falling in one of the above-listed categories.  A reasonable belief is likely to be interpreted as an objectively reasonable belief, as it is in other federal whistleblower protections, requiring the belief be one a reasonable person in the same factual circumstances would hold. Third, the employee must disclose the wrongdoing to one of the following individuals or entities: (1) the Board, (2) an inspector general, (3) Comptroller General, (4) a member of Congress, (5) a state or federal regulatory or law enforcement agency, (6) a person with supervisory authority over the employee, (7) a court, (8) a grand jury, or (9) the head of a federal agency. The Act specifically states that the whistleblower protection applies to internal disclosures and disclosures made in the ordinary course of the employee’s duties. If an employee’s actions meet all three requirements, he/she is protected as a whistleblower under the Act.

 

This protection means that his/her employer is prohibited from taking any action toward that employee that would dissuade a reasonable person from making such a disclosure.  An employee seeking to prove that his/her employer’s actions were retaliatory must show that his/her protected conduct (defined above) was a “contributing factor” in the employment action taken.  The Act specifically states that knowledge of the employee’s disclosure by the person taking the employment action and temporal proximity between the action and the disclosure are sufficient to show that the whistleblowing disclosure was a contributing factor in the employment action.  To rebut such a showing, an employer must demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence—a very high standard—that the action would have been taken regardless of the disclosure.  This standard is a significant departure from other whistleblower retaliation protections and will make it significantly easier for employees to successfully prove a claim.  If a claim is successfully proven, an employee may be granted reinstatement, back pay, compensatory damages, and costs and attorneys’ fees.

 

The Act does contain an administrative exhaustion requirement.  Employees alleging a violation of the Act must file a complaint with the appropriate inspector general.  The inspector general must within 180 days of receipt of the complaint either (1) determine that the claim is frivolous; does not relate to stimulus funds; or is already pending with another agency or (2) investigate and render a decision on the claim.  If a violation is found, the head of the applicable agency must award appropriate remedies within 30 days of receipt of the investigation findings.  After 210 days (180 for the investigation and decision and 30 for the remedy) or after a partial or full denial of relief, the employee may appeal and bring an action in federal court reviewing the agency’s decision de novo.  This court appeal right includes the right to a trial by jury.  It is important to also note that any applicable arbitration agreement signed by the employee prior to the whistleblower complaint is not effective in waiving the employee’s right to a court action under the Act.  In addition, the Act requires that employers receiving stimulus funds post notice of employees’ rights and remedies under the whistleblower protection section of the Act.

 

Employers accepting stimulus funds or awarded contracts using stimulus funds should take notice of this provision. They also should take complaints from employees regarding misuse of stimulus funds, fraud, or waste very seriously, investigate them, and document the investigation appropriately.  Because of the lenient employee-friendly burden of proof under the Act allowing for proof of retaliation by temporal proximity or mere knowledge, employers should proceed very cautiously in taking adverse employment action against an employee who recently made complaints that fall within the Act’s protections.

Controversial Immigration Provision Included in Final Stimulus Bill

The conference committee negotiating the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (H.R.1), also known as the stimulus bill, agreed to include one controversial immigration provision, but deleted a second. The first provision prohibits all financial institutions receiving TARP funds from hiring any employee in H-1B status unless the company complies with the H-1B dependent provisions. These provisions inhibit the ability by an employer to hire H-1B employees by requiring a recruiting process similar to an application for labor certification before filing the petition. This will make it very difficult for any recipient of TARP funds to hire or retain H-1B employees, and will deny banks and other recipients the ability to hire highly skilled individuals for some positions.

Opponents of the bill have argued that rather than stimulating the economy, this provision could actually have the opposite effect by stifling the ability of troubled businesses to hire and retain the expertise needed for their operations. The second provision, requiring the expansion of E-Verify to even more employers, has been deleted.