Skip to content

Menu

HomeAboutContact

Search…

Employer Law Report

Helping employers avoid the storm of legal issues in the workplace

Davis v. Michigan Bell

Subscribe to Davis v. Michigan Bell via RSS

Recent Sixth Circuit Decision Authorizes Creative Solution to Address Runaway Intermittent Leave

By Brian Hall on October 17, 2008

Many employers have been pulling their hair out attempting to address runaway intermittent leave under the FMLA. The Sixth Circuit’s decision in Davis v. Michigan Bell authorizes one creative solution – change your 12-month FMLA period to a calendar-year basis.
Continue Reading Recent Sixth Circuit Decision Authorizes Creative Solution to Address Runaway Intermittent Leave

Posted in Leave Administration

Subscribe to this blog

Your website url

Stay Connected

Subscribe to this blog via RSS View LinkedIn Profile Twitter Facebook Instagram

Search…

Topics

Topics

A Twitter List by PorterWright

Archives

Archives

Blog Authors Show/Hide

Rob Cohen
Greg Daugherty
Jourdan Day
Kelsey Gee
Brian Hall
Victoria Hanohano-Hong
Hannah Harris
Jennifer Huelskamp
Brad Hughes
James Jensen
Laura Jurcevich
Catherine Kang
Jared Klaus
Rebecca Kopp Levine
Jonithon LaCross
Jay L. Levine
Tony McClure
Emily Peffer
Fred Pressley
Jamie Repasky
Chris Russell
Teresa Snider
Sarah Squillante
John Stephen
Helen Sudhoff
Tracey Turnbull
Charlie Warner

Porter Wright Blogs

Antitrust Law Source
Banking & Finance Law Report
Employee Benefits Law Report
Energy Law Report
Federal Securities Law Source
Ohio Appellate Insights
Technology Law Source

Employer Law Report

Cincinnati|Cleveland|Columbus|Dayton|Naples|Washington|Pittsburgh|Chicago|Tampa

Subscribe to this blog via RSS View LinkedIn Profile Twitter Facebook Instagram

Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP offers this blog for general informational purposes only. The content of this blog is not intended as legal advice for any purpose, and you should not consider it as such advice or as a legal opinion on any matters. This blog does not necessarily reflect the views of the firm as to any particular matter or those of its clients. The information provided herein is subject to change without notice, and you may not rely upon any such information with regard to a particular matter or set of facts. Further, the use of the blog does not create, and is not intended to create, any attorney-client relationship between you and Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP or any individual lawyer in the firm. No such relationship will be considered to have been formed until we have had an opportunity to resolve any conflict of interest issues and have advised you, in writing, of the nature and scope of the legal services to be provided. Unless we establish an attorney-client relationship with you with regard to the particular matter, we will not treat any information that you may send to us, or submit as a comment to a blog article or entry, as confidential or privileged, and any unsolicited communications may be disclosed to other persons without regard to confidentiality considerations. Use of the blog is at your own risk, and the site is provided without warranty of any kind. We make no warranties of any kind regarding the accuracy or completeness of any information on this blog, and we make no representations regarding whether such information is reliable, up-to-date, or applicable to any particular situation. Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP expressly disclaims all liability for actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this blog, or for any damages resulting from your viewing and use of this blog.

Copyright © 2025, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP. All Rights Reserved.

Law blog design & platform by LexBlog